Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% |
2 | JARDIM Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
3 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 13% | |
3 | LYON Drew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
5 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 12% | |
6 | BENNETT III Carl | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
7 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | |
8 | HAMILL Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
9 | RICHERSON James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 15% |
10 | LE Brandon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 3% | |
11 | RENGER Felipe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
12 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
13 | QI Parker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
14 | PAL Anjali G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
15 | MERRIMAN Morgan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
16 | WEST Matthew S. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
17 | NGO Ben | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
18 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
19 | JUELKE Reaghan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
20 | LOFGREN Reese | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
21 | BENNETT Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
22 | WEAVER Charles | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
23 | BOONE Jason | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
24 | PATTERSON Michael | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - | |
25 | NI Yan-Jing | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | |
26 | VIDRINE Odile | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
27 | RODRIGUEZ Jason | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
28 | RATTANA Anushawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 15% |
29 | HAGEN Samuel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 3% |
30 | CROWLEY James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
31 | HOLDER Thomas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
32 | FRANCHINI Erin | 100% | 98% | 77% | 28% | 3% | - | |
33 | SIKES Adam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% | |
34 | ASHY Katia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
35 | THU John | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
36 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
36 | BROOKS John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
38 | ST.PIERRE Christopher | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | CONE James | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | KENYON Briella | 100% | 94% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
40 | LEE Angela | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
42 | MCCLURE Morgan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
43 | KALE Omkar | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 7% | - | |
44 | TAYLOR Wise | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | WOODS Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
46 | JORDAN Christopher | 100% | 87% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
47 | VINSON Rachel | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
48 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
49 | FREE Sara | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
50 | MEYERS Lucas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
51 | KONKON Nahomy | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
52 | NELSON Julia | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
53 | LIU Hui Hui | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
53 | LUSK Ian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | 1% | |
55 | HARRIS Patrick | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
56 | SHELTON Victoria | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
57 | POSADAS Allison | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.