Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
2 | LEE Brendan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
3 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
3 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 13% |
5 | LIN James G. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
6 | SIU Aiden | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
7 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% | |
8 | LING Eddie | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
9 | LI Aaron | - | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
10 | MATSAKH Philip | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
11 | YAO Bradley | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
12 | ZENG Rick | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
13 | SHAO Eric | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
14 | HAN Derek | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
15 | UNGERER Roger M. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
16 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
17 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
18 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
19 | SENIC Lucas | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
20 | GUO Justin | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
21 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
22 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | 5% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
23 | TANG Albert | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 4% |
24 | MALHAM Andrew | 2% | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
25 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 9% |
26 | TANG Terry | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
27 | HUANG Eythan | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
28 | WONG Jackson | - | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
29 | CO Dylan | 2% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
30 | WU Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
31 | TANG Alexander L. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
32 | LIU Derek | - | < 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
33 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
34 | TANG August L. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
35 | RUSSELL Paul | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
36 | AGRAWAL Niki | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
37 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
38 | WU Alber Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
39 | TAN Aidan | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
40 | JIN Andy | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
42 | GULCHIN Mark | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
43 | SONG Noel | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
44 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
45 | YU William | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
46 | TOOMRE Luca | 1% | 14% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
47 | BOBROW Silas | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
48 | MO Ethan | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
49 | SHENG Dalton | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
50 | HUA Aaron | 33% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
51 | UNGERER Henry | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
52 | GUTH Joseph | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
53 | CHO Xzander | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 12% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
55 | TSAY Jordan R. | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
56 | LIU Jeremiah | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
57 | XU Nathan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
58 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | LIU Robert | 14% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
60 | WANDJI NANA Noah | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - |
61 | BELOKON Sammy | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
62 | CHEN Ethan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
63 | CHENG Logan | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
64 | WONG Jacob W. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
65 | MCGRATH Oliver | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | SHKURY Ariel | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
67 | MCGRATH Milo | 13% | 45% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.