Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | CULLIVAN Justice | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | REEVES Liam | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | LU Yikai | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | JI Aidan Y. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | LOVIN Vlad | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | FLYNN Ian | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | DORE Davis | V V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | NUNNINK Phillip W. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 11 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | DEDENBACH Joseph | V V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | ANDERSON Jacob | D V V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | WANG Andrew | V D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 15 | LIU Jacob B. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | PORRAS Cristian | D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 17 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | V V V V D D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 18 | GOGOI Vir K. | V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 19 | POLONSKI Anthony | D D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | ZHAO Bowen | V V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 21 | TALASILA Arush | D D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 22 | SANTOS Carlos R. | D V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 23 | RAJPAL Alastair | D D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 23 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 25 | EUH Jason | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 26 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 27 | IRISH Thomas | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 28 | BOYKO Miles | V D D D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
| 29 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | CHOI Simon | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 31 | BARCA Bryant | V D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | ELSEN William | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | BIESIADA Jan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 34 | MARTIN William | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.