Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LE Tan | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 2 | REIDY Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 3 | EVANS Allen L. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 | PAN Colin | 2% | 16% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 5 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% | |
| 6 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 7 | LU Samantha R. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 8 | DICKENS Thomas | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 9 | POWERS Meredith R. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 10 | ZELENSKY Paul | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | CLAY Cameron | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 12 | SHOWALTER Zachary | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 13 | SMITH IV Edward (Ted) A. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 15 | ZOOK Evan D. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 16 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | JOYNER Brian | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | DAVIS Robert C. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | GOLART Alexis A. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 20 | SMYTH Sefton K. | 35% | 40% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | FORREST John | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SOPHRONIUS Jeddie | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 23 | WORRALL Cary | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | - | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 25 | LU Qi | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | GIACOPASSI Dean D. | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.