Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | EMMER Chase T. | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | ZHANG Daniel D. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | UM Ethan A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LI Richard | D D V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 5 | LIU Niles J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | LI Owen | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | JIANG Owen | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 9 | HO Ryan J. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 14 | BING Charles | V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | GONG Benjamin | V V V D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 16 | LIU Patrick | V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 17 | LIN Richard W. | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | AHN Jun | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 19 | WU Alexander | V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | BAE Kevin | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | HOWARD Michael | V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 22 | MCLEAN Miles K. | V V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 23 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 24 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | V D D V V | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 27 | SEZER Kaya | D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 28 | SHA Yi Peng | V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 29 | WANG Mason | V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 30 | LI Eric | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 31 | SHIN Joshua J. | V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 32 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 33 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | BARTEL Jacob L. | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 35 | PO Oliver | V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 36 | ACHILOV Sayid | D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 37 | LIGH Thomas | D V V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 38 | TSAI Max W. | D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 39 | GU Andrew | V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 40 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 41 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 42 | PAN Eric | D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 43 | LEE Jacob J | V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 44 | KLOSTERMANN Max | D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 45 | THADHANI Elio | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 46 | JIN Dennis H. | D D V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 47 | MILLER Aidan A. | D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 48 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 49 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 50 | MENG Zhaoyi | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 51 | ZHAO Jesse | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 52 | ALIMI Yacine A. | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 53 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 53 | VALENTON Timothy | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 55 | ZHEN Ethan | D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 56 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 57 | KONG Luculentus X. | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 58 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 59 | RNO Kyler | D D V D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 60 | BERGERON Justin | D D D D | V D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 61 | XU Ethan | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 62 | GARDOS Noah | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 63 | WU Michael | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 64 | LICCIARDI Davin | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 65 | BILODEAU Leo | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 66 | GLEBA Nico | D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 67 | DALOMBA Kingston | D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
| 68 | BOUSSY Luciano | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 68 | DENG Kenny | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 70 | CANEDO James | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.