New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 2 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 3 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 3 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 5 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 6 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 7 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 8 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
| 9 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | |
| 10 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 11 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 12 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 13 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 14 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 16 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 17 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | |
| 18 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | |
| 19 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 20 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% |
| 21 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 22 | PENG Florella | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | |
| 24 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 25 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | DONG Angel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 29 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 39 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 40 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 100% | 90% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 44 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 45 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | GIBEK Victoria | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | GOW Sydney | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | WOTZAK Kaia | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.