New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 2 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
| 3 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 5 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 6 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
| 7 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% |
| 8 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 8% |
| 10 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 11 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 13 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 14 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 45% | 10% |
| 15 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 16 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | TANG Terry | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 19 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 20 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
| 21 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | BATRA-BANG Jonah | 100% | 99% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 24 | FRUSZTAJER Miklosh | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 25 | WHELAN Alexander H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 26 | TAE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | TJON Calum | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SONG Noel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | JIA Jing Yu | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | GERRISH William | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 32 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 33 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Julang | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 37 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SCHLACK Jake | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | BLEIL Tyler | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | BRENNEMAN Titus | 100% | 93% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LOGAN Kai | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHEN Jimmy | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 47 | LIU ERIC | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | SOLOPOULOS James | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | KELKAR Aakash | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | WEI Qian | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | WILSON Eric | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.