New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 2 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 4% | 43% | 53% | |
| 3 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 47% |
| 3 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 5 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
| 6 | MI Aileen | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 12% |
| 7 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
| 8 | CALISE Ella | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 9% | |
| 9 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 17% |
| 10 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 24% | |
| 11 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 1% | 14% | 45% | 35% | 5% |
| 12 | MCSHERRY Ava | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 1% | 10% | 56% | 34% | |
| 14 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | - | 1% | 10% | 49% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 15 | WANG Jasmine | - | - | 2% | 19% | 51% | 28% | |
| 16 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | YANG Iris | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% | |
| 19 | YU Jane | 18% | 46% | 29% | 6% | < 1% | - | |
| 20 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 40% | 6% |
| 21 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 22 | HOU Wendong | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 23 | SHIM Grace | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 20% | 2% | |
| 24 | WANG Jolie Z. | 5% | 38% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 26 | FIELD Julianna | 2% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | YANG Lingting | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 43% | 7% | |
| 28 | ZELDIN Nadia | 16% | 43% | 33% | 7% | - | - | |
| 29 | LEVY Avery | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | HAO Danica | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | SMIDA Julia | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | PAULUS Sloane | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | POPOVA Polina | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 34 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 35 | WANG Reese | 17% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | LI Eleanor | 31% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | LAO Sophia | 6% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | WANG Rachael | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | SONPAL Vivian | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | SHENG Katherine | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | GREENLEAF Ella | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KUMAR Ishana | 6% | 35% | 51% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CHANG Victoria | 40% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | HWANG Chanel | 27% | 53% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | MCNULTY Avery | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 18% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | SHI Sasha | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | MURPHY Charlotte | 5% | 33% | 46% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | LI Han | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | POWLEDGE Cora | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 51 | LI Beryl | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.