New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 2 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 53% | |
| 3 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
| 3 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 5 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | |
| 6 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 12% |
| 7 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% | |
| 8 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 9% | |
| 9 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 17% |
| 10 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
| 11 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | 5% |
| 12 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 13 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 34% | |
| 14 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 40% | 7% | - |
| 15 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 28% | |
| 16 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | |
| 19 | YU Jane | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | < 1% | - | |
| 20 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | 6% |
| 21 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 22 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | 3% | |
| 23 | SHIM Grace | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 22% | 2% | |
| 24 | WANG Jolie Z. | 100% | 95% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 4% |
| 26 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 98% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 7% | |
| 28 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 84% | 41% | 7% | - | - | |
| 29 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | HAO Danica | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | SMIDA Julia | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | POPOVA Polina | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 34 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 15% | 1% | |
| 35 | WANG Reese | 100% | 83% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | LAO Sophia | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | WANG Rachael | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | SONPAL Vivian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | GREENLEAF Ella | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KUMAR Ishana | 100% | 94% | 59% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CHANG Victoria | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | HWANG Chanel | 100% | 73% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | MCNULTY Avery | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | SHI Sasha | 100% | 84% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | MURPHY Charlotte | 100% | 95% | 62% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | LI Han | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | POWLEDGE Cora | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 51 | LI Beryl | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.