New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 2 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 3 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 3 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 5 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 2% |
| 6 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 7 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | |
| 8 | WANG daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 9 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | |
| 10 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
| 11 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 12 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 14 | KIETLINSKI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 15 | LEUNG Ian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 16 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 17 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 19 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 21 | FADEL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 3% |
| 22 | MONTALVO Matthew | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | SALDARINI Glenn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 10% | |
| 24 | SHAPIRO Simon | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | MALDARI Luke | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 27 | LOO Jason | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | GERTSBERG Eli | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 95% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | ABDEL-DAYEM Ibrahim | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | LIN Justin | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | GOMEZ Emilio | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 34 | HOLTSCHLAG Milo | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | CHENG Sawyer | 100% | 97% | 71% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | MEHTA Krish | 100% | 77% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.