King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | TRULL A.J. | - | 11% | 40% | 38% | 11% | |
| 2 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | MILLER Quinlan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 5 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 16% | 61% | 21% |
| 6 | BRODSKY Julian | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 7 | ZENG Andrew | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 8 | SHOUSHA Hamza | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
| 9 | KIM Tae | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 10 | CHEN Brian | - | 7% | 34% | 43% | 15% | |
| 11 | XIE Brandon | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 12 | FENG shang | 3% | 31% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 13 | SOKOL Luke | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | PARK Nicholas | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 15 | MAO Benjamin | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | BRADSHAW Carter | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | LU Nathan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | LAI Boden | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 19 | SINGH Ravin | 2% | 24% | 44% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 20 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 4% | 47% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 34% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | GINZBURG Adam | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 24 | LI Jade | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | DA GRACA Tyler | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | BOYD Kyle | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 27 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | STEIN Henry | 13% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ROOK, JR Ethan | 3% | 21% | 44% | 29% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.