Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 2 | GREGSTON Layland | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% | |
| 3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | 1% | 15% | 56% | 28% | |
| 3 | KIM Nathan | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | |
| 5 | CHIN Dylan A. | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 6 | KIM Jayden | 15% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 7 | THOMAS Michael | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 8 | KIM Harrison | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 9 | VRAPI Dorian A. | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 10 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 1% |
| 11 | RAINEY Daniel | 9% | 37% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 12 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | KENT V David | 31% | 47% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | LEE inwoo | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 15 | CHUNG Michael | 25% | 50% | 23% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | BUERGISSER Tae | 8% | 36% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.