Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WALSH Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
| 2 | SATTERFIELD Donald | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 3 | RODGERS John (Scott) S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 3 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 5 | SAUTHOFF Chris | 100% | 96% | 70% | 25% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 6 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 19% | |
| 7 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 8 | REES Daniel I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% | |
| 9 | LI Patrick | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | BARTLETT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 11 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | OLSON Samuel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | FERRELL-CARRETEY Elliot | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | KIM Eugene | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 16 | BURBEY Sam | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 18 | KOSANOVICH Jillian | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | PEARSON Heila | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | EBELL Ivan D. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 15% | 1% | |
| 21 | PEARSON Arwa | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | ARCHULETA Hailey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LUTTON Patricia | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 24 | EDWARDS Kiran | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | ENGDAHL Terre | 100% | 99% | 82% | 32% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.