Grand Rapids, MI - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
2 | PITCHER Skylar L. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 25% |
3 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
3 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
5 | ANDERSON Colton J. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
6 | YI Stephen K. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 50% | 23% |
7 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
8 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
9 | YANG Luao | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 46% |
10 | PRASANNA Advaith | - | 5% | 37% | 44% | 14% | - |
11 | UPTON Craig | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
12 | JI Aidan Y. | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - |
13 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - |
14 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | 3% | 30% | 47% | 18% | 1% |
15 | CHENG Nathan | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
15 | LOVIN Vlad | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
17 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
18 | GOGOI Vir K. | 2% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | - |
19 | REEVES Liam | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 41% | 2% |
20 | VAN BUREN Brett J. | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - |
21 | WONG Antonio | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
22 | KHAN Adnan | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
23 | ZHENG zhe | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
23 | EUH Jason | 45% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - |
25 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
26 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
27 | AMES Tucker | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
28 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
29 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 40% | 52% | 8% | - | - | - |
30 | PALWAI Suhas | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.