, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GUO Jessica Zi Jia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
2 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
3 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
3 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
5 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
6 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
7 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
8 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
9 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
10 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
11 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | |
12 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
13 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
14 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
15 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
16 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
17 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
18 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
19 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | ||
20 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
21 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
22 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
23 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
24 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
25 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
26 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% |
27 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
28 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
29 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
30 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
31 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
32 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
33 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
34 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
35 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
36 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
37 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - |
39 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
40 | KOREN Lihy Peer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
41 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
42 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
43 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 8% | ||
44 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
45 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
45 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
47 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
48 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
49 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
50 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
51 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
52 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
53 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
54 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
55 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 14% | - |
56 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 3% |
57 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - |
58 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
59 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
60 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
60 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
62 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 1% |
63 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
64 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
65 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
66 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
67 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% | |
68 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
69 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
70 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
71 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
72 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
73 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 77% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
74 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
74 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
76 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 47% | 9% | ||
77 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
78 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
79 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
80 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
81 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
82 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
83 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
84 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
85 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
86 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 91% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
87 | GU EMILY | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
88 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
89 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 83% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
90 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
90 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 44% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
92 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
93 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
94 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
95 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 96% | 56% | 15% | 1% | ||
96 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
97 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
98 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
98 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
100 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
101 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
102 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
103 | SU Michelle | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
104 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
105 | DATLA Medha | 100% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
106 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
106 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 70% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
108 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
109 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 96% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
109 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 32% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
111 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 52% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
112 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 75% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
113 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
114 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
114 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
116 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 84% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
117 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 87% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
118 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
119 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | ||
120 | BRADFORD Meeah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
121 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
122 | QIAN Zhiyan | 100% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
123 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
124 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
125 | DATLA Meha | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.