Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center - Miami, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NDIAYE Edriss | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
2 | LUTAR Lucas N. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
3 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
3 | VITI Mark G. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
5 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
6 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
7 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
8 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
9 | EMMER Chase T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% |
10 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
11 | TUMMINGS C.J. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
12 | LEE Chris | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
13 | FU Samuel Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
14 | REALS Alden D. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
15 | WALTER Evran M. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
16 | CHEN Allen | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
17 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
18 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
19 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
20 | JANG Jaewon | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
21 | LOCKWOOD Owen | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
22 | LOUIE Timothy J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
23 | CHEN Andrew | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
24 | LIU Eric P. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
25 | SMITH Quin | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
26 | LIU Kevin X. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
27 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
28 | ZHANG Henry C. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
29 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
30 | KIM Tei D. | 3% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | CHAN Tyler | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | LI Yulei | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
33 | GEE Brandon | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
34 | SINGH Dayaal | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
35 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
36 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
37 | GU Jeffrey | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
38 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
39 | SHIKHMAN Robert | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
40 | STANLEY Hanno | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
41 | MITCHUM Drew J | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
42 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
43 | PAE Jonathan L. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
44 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
44 | WEN George C. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
47 | KASI Sanjay | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
48 | LI Jeffrey | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
49 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
50 | YU Vinni | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
51 | PICARD Justin | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
52 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
53 | ONIK Elijah T. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
54 | TIAN Aaron C. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
55 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
55 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
57 | EDWARDS Mark S. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
58 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
60 | FURST Matthew C. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
62 | MAK Jeff | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
63 | BELLUOMO David C. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
64 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | BOBROW Logan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
68 | BRODERICK Padraig | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
69 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
70 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
71 | SURINGA William J. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
72 | SHA Yi Peng | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
74 | SONG Leonardo T. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
75 | MAHNKEN Thomas | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
76 | YOST Jacob A. | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
77 | PAULSON Connor M. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
78 | VLAHOS Ioannis M. | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
79 | BARBER Stas A. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
80 | LE Vyn A. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
82 | CIDECIYAN Nicholas | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
84 | FAJER Jacob K. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.