Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center - Miami, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NDIAYE Edriss | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
| 2 | LUTAR Lucas N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | VITI Mark G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 5 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 6 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 7 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 8 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% |
| 9 | EMMER Chase T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 10 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
| 11 | TUMMINGS C.J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 13 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 14 | REALS Alden D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | WALTER Evran M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 16 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 17 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 18 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 19 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 20 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
| 21 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 22 | LOUIE Timothy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 23 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | SMITH Quin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 7% |
| 26 | LIU Kevin X. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 27 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 28 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LI Yulei | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 35 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 36 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 37 | GU Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 39 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 40 | STANLEY Hanno | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 41 | MITCHUM Drew J | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 42 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 43 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 44 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | WEN George C. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 49 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 17% | 3% |
| 50 | YU Vinni | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 51 | PICARD Justin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 52 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 53 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 55 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 57 | EDWARDS Mark S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 58 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 60 | FURST Matthew C. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 62 | MAK Jeff | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 63 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 68 | BRODERICK Padraig | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 69 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 70 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | SURINGA William J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 72 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 73 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 75 | MAHNKEN Thomas | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 76 | YOST Jacob A. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 77 | PAULSON Connor M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 78 | VLAHOS Ioannis M. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | BARBER Stas A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 80 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 82 | CIDECIYAN Nicholas | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | FAJER Jacob K. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.