Duluth, GA - Duluth, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
2 | CHO Tyler H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
3 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
3 | KIM Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
5 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
6 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
7 | DOELEMAN zeno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
8 | PARK Jong-Eun | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
9 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% |
10 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
11 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
12 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
13 | AL-TAYEB Ahmed M. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
14 | JAMES Samuel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
15 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 11% | |
16 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
17 | NORMAN Christian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
18 | JACKSON James | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - |
19 | PARNAS Ely | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | |
20 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
21 | JEON Hwidong | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
22 | CRANE Matthew T. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
23 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
24 | WANG Maxwell L. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
25 | MA Bochen | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
26 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
27 | DILLE Brice | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
28 | SCHARF Ryan | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.