Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 2 | MARSEE Samantha | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
| 3 | XI Shining | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 3 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 5 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
| 7 | TANG Catherine H. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 8 | JUNG Irene | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 10 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 11 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 12 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 13 | SHIN Andrea Y. | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
| 14 | YONG Erika E. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 15 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | BARTON Mele | 7% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 18 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 1% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 10% |
| 22 | HOLMES Emma | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | GEYER Carolina M. | - | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 25 | JEAN Olympe G. | - | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 26 | KER Grace | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 27 | NOVICK Mia J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 29 | YANG Lea | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KIM Sujin | 6% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | CHIN Elise | 8% | 46% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | CHANG Audrey | 3% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | NGUYEN Siena | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 34 | LIN Lauren | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | WANG Zidan | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | TONG Jessie | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | LIN Grace | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | PI Sophia | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | NEELEY Leilani | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
| 40 | GEYER Victoria M. | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.