Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
2 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
3 | XI Shining | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
3 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
5 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
7 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
8 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
9 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
10 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
11 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
12 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
13 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 4% | |
14 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
15 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
16 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 93% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
17 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
18 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
19 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
20 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 10% |
22 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
24 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
25 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
26 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
27 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
28 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
29 | YANG Lea | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 94% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
31 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 92% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
32 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
34 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
35 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
36 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
37 | LIN Grace | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
38 | PI Sophia | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
39 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
40 | GEYER Victoria M. | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.