Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
2 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
3 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
3 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
5 | YAO Yilin | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
6 | KUKVA Taisiya | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
7 | PRIMES Amanda M. | - | 7% | 32% | 44% | 17% | |
8 | SHELIN Chelsea | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
9 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
10 | KIM Jayna | 1% | 18% | 44% | 31% | 6% | |
11 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
12 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
13 | SMIK Leonie A. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
14 | BEAMS Alyona | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
15 | MADRID Maureen | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
16 | CHANG Celine A. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
17 | HSU Adele Y. | 6% | 41% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
18 | LEE youngin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
19 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
20 | DONDISCH Sophia | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
21 | MOHEBI Sue | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
22 | DONDISCH Andrea | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.