Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 2 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 3 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | |
| 3 | XI Shining | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% |
| 5 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 6 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 7 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 4% |
| 8 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 9 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 10 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 11 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 12 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 13 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | PI Sophia | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 19 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | - | |
| 22 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 23 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 6% |
| 24 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 3% | |
| 25 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 28 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 29 | HU Michelle | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 100% | 87% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | LIN Grace | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | GEYER Victoria M. | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | CHEN Athena | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.