Myrtle Beach Convention Center, Hall A - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 2 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 2% | |
| 3 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 3 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 5 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 6 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 7 | MODULLA Yathin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 8 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | HERNÁNDEZ Leandros | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 11 | CHUNG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% | |
| 12 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 13 | BUI Henry | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 14 | MAROCHNIK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 15 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | |
| 16 | FISHMAN Rahm | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
| 17 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | GONZALEZ Aaron M | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 20 | RUIZ Jayden | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 22 | HAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 23 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 24 | RIDGELL John | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | GOLDSON Tyrese | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 27 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | FARRER Brennecke E | 100% | 98% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | DAN Rex | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | CASWELL Colten | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 3% |
| 31 | PAL Ian K. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | MCCOLLAM Isaac | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | LIU Nick | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | REDDY Daksh | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | NELSON Cole | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 36 | OUELLETTE Ethan | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | JIANG Harry | 100% | 96% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | ALEXANDER John | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.