Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% |
| 2 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 3 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 5 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 6 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 7 | FERRIS George H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 8 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 9 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 9% |
| 12 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
| 13 | REYES Kyle | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 14 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
| 18 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
| 19 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 20 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | GREENE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 9% |
| 22 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | LO Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 29 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 30 | CORTEZ Christopher | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | YU Thomas | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | OH Triton | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HU Andrew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 37 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 41 | PANCHAL Shival | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BURDAN Gabriel | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.