Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 2 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 3 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 3 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% |
| 5 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 6 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 7 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 8 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 8% | |
| 9 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | 5% |
| 10 | IGOE Nirali B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 7% |
| 11 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | 1% |
| 12 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 13 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% |
| 14 | SZEWC Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 15 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 16 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 18 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 19 | LEE kyungmin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 21% | |
| 20 | NI Emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
| 21 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | MUTAKABBIR amira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 24 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 94% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 28 | PALANSKI Cate | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 29 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 30 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 33 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 93% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
| 34 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 35 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 4% | |
| 36 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
| 37 | LI Alisha | 100% | 98% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | |
| 39 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 92% | 54% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | LAMBERT Camille L. | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | UCLES Giovanna | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | KIM Lynne | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | BLANCHARD Remy | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.