Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 2 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 3 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 3 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 5 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 6 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 7 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 8 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 9 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 10 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 11 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 12 | LI Alisha | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 14 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 94% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | YOU Emily | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | MUTAKABBIR amira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 18 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 20 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 21 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 7% | |
| 22 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 24 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
| 28 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | |
| 29 | PALANSKI Cate | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 30 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | UCLES Giovanna | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LATORA Jordan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | GANGEMI Julia | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | KIM Lynne | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.