Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 2 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 3 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 44% | 29% |
| 5 | LEE Chris | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 6 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 46% |
| 7 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 8 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 9 | PARK Luke J. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 10 | NAGIMOV Marsel | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 11 | ZHANG Daniel D. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 12 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 13 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 3% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 14 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 15 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 16 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 18 | CHEN Andrew | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | JANG Jaewon | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 49% | 25% |
| 20 | CHOUN Minwook (Sam) | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 21 | JEON Alexander E. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 22 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 23 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 36% |
| 24 | ZHANG Henry C. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 25 | XU Max | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | YU Vinni | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 27 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 28 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 29 | WAN Jason | 3% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHOY Lucas B. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 31 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 32 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
| 34 | KIM Tei D. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 35 | BALL James T. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 36 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
| 37 | PELOSKY Zack B. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 38 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 39 | ROBSON Samuel | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | CHUNG Jinwoo | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 42 | OH Jonathan | 12% | 49% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 44 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | OAKLAND Brennan D. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 46 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 47 | NG Eben S. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 48 | BAE Kevin | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | KAO Castor T. | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 49 | KIM Yonjae | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 51 | CHEN Allen | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | SONG Aiden S. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 53 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 54 | KASI Sanjay | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 55 | LAO Scott E. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 56 | WONG Adam L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 57 | SINGH Dayaal | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 58 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | SEAH Chad | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 62 | KIM Brandon J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 63 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 64 | LI Jiaan | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 65 | SOYSKI Harrison Q. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 66 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 67 | LI Raphael C. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 68 | CHOI Samuel | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 69 | WU Nicholas | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | WEN George C. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 72 | DANKAR Neel | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 74 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 75 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 76 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | BREIER Matthew F. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 78 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | MURRAY Maximo | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 80 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 81 | JEON Caleb A. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 82 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 83 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 84 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 85 | WU Jerry | 7% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 87 | KHER Roan | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | WEINKOPF William O. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 89 | GALLUCCI Charles John | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 90 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 91 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 92 | MARTOS Jimmy | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 93 | CHENG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 93 | LANG Dong Lin | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 95 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 96 | LIN Dashiell | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 97 | KIM Jackson | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 97 | MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 99 | STIAGUN Nikita | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 100 | FU Samuel Y. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 101 | MILLER Duncan R. | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 102 | SONG Dylan S. | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 103 | TSAI Max W. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 104 | FLYNN Ian | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 105 | CATINO Brennen | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 106 | SONG Leonardo T. | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 107 | KWON Ethan | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 108 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 18% | 50% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 111 | WU Conrad J. | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 112 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 113 | LE Vyn A. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 114 | BELLUOMO David C. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 115 | WANG Andrew | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 116 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 117 | KUO Evan | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 118 | ZHAO Jesse | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 118 | JI Aidan Y. | 12% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 120 | PARKER Riley D. | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 122 | NEWELL Ian A. | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 123 | SIEGEL William P. | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 124 | MU Jeffrey | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 125 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
| 126 | YOUNGBLOOD Woody C. | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 127 | BAO Aaron | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 128 | DRESSEL Jet | 49% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 129 | METTE Russell | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 130 | KOKKER Thomas | 22% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 131 | NAM Michael | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 131 | FINLEY Dylan | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.