PTBA Basketball Association - La Puente, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LING Eddie | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | WU Alber Y. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
3 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
5 | CHOI Ethan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
6 | NICOLETTI Luca | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
6 | MORROW Brenden | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
8 | NGUYEN Martin | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
9 | YUE Jackson | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
10 | DERRICK Blake | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
10 | PARK Rion | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
12 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
13 | KIM Daniel Y. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
14 | YI William | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
15 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
16 | KAWADA Sebastien | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
17 | PARK Sangmin | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
18 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
19 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | V D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
20 | GORDON William L. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
21 | LI Richard | D V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
21 | TULYAG Azim | V V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
23 | WONG Evan | D V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
24 | YANG Charles | D V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
25 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | D V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
26 | MANIKTALA Suvir | V V D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
27 | PARK William | V V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
28 | LE Jacob | D D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
29 | CHANG Jonathan | D D V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
30 | LIM Zachary | D D V D D V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
31 | JEONG Taewoo | D D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
32 | BURRES kenneth | D D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
33 | PARK David | V V V V D D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
34 | BIELER Mason | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
35 | DENG David | D V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
36 | CHEN Matthew | V D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
37 | TAN Pyron | D V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
38 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | D D V D D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
39 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | V D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
40 | CHOI Ethan | D V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
41 | CHANG Jeremy | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
42 | ONG Nicholas | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
43 | LIANG Ethan | D D V D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
44 | MORROW Sean | D D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
45 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
46 | SISINNI Leonardo | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
47 | ZHONG Maxwell | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
48 | WANG rainier | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
49 | CHEN Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
50 | ZHANG Max | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
51 | ZHANG Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
52 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
53 | CHEN David | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
54 | FOY Grant | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
55 | UPENDER West | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
55 | PARK Roy | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.