Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | - | - | 3% | 97% |
| 2 | REEVES Liam | - | - | - | 4% | 46% | 50% | |
| 3 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% | |
| 5 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 6 | LEE Lukas | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 7 | HAN Derek | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 22% | |
| 8 | LOGSDON Samuel | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
| 9 | RAJPAL Alastair | - | - | 5% | 27% | 53% | 15% | - |
| 10 | LAI Twayne | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% | |
| 11 | GUTH Joseph | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 12 | SZIRAKI Jordan | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 13 | KELLY Tommy | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 14 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 4% | |
| 15 | REAUME Nate | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 12% | |
| 17 | SENIC Lucas | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 36% | 7% | |
| 18 | MASSIE Otto | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | KNIBBE Nathan | 5% | 30% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | STRINGER David | 18% | 47% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 21 | EDWARDS Maxon | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - | |
| 22 | MAYNARD Maxwell | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | - |
| 23 | TAMIYA Masao | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
| 24 | VANOYEN Dominick | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 25 | CHUANG Oscar | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 30% | 2% | |
| 27 | DUNLAP Ian | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 28 | TOWNE Benjamin | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 29 | HEYBOER Jason | 5% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | BHATTIPROLU Shrihit | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 31 | KUE Temujin | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | TATE Liam | - | 6% | 31% | 51% | 12% | - | |
| 33 | FINDLAY Zachary | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 34 | NAZARIO Dominic | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 35 | MCISAAC Finn | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | LATTA Zaiden | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | MAVANI Krishna | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | ZMUDA Aiden | 18% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | LATTA Zamir | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - | - |
| 40 | LIN Vincent | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | MARK IAN | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | TACK Everett | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | MANGIONE Alexander | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.