Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | - | - | 3% | 97% |
2 | REEVES Liam | - | - | - | 4% | 46% | 50% | |
3 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
3 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% | |
5 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
6 | LEE Lukas | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
7 | HAN Derek | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 22% | |
8 | LOGSDON Samuel | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
9 | RAJPAL Alastair | - | - | 5% | 27% | 53% | 15% | - |
10 | LAI Twayne | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% | |
11 | GUTH Joseph | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
12 | SZIRAKI Jordan | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
13 | KELLY Tommy | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
14 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 4% | |
15 | REAUME Nate | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
16 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 12% | |
17 | SENIC Lucas | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 36% | 7% | |
18 | MASSIE Otto | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
19 | KNIBBE Nathan | 5% | 30% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | |
20 | STRINGER David | 18% | 47% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
21 | EDWARDS Maxon | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - | |
22 | MAYNARD Maxwell | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | - |
23 | TAMIYA Masao | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
24 | VANOYEN Dominick | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | |
25 | CHUANG Oscar | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 30% | 2% | |
27 | DUNLAP Ian | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
28 | TOWNE Benjamin | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
29 | HEYBOER Jason | 5% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
30 | BHATTIPROLU Shrihit | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
31 | KUE Temujin | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | TATE Liam | - | 6% | 31% | 51% | 12% | - | |
33 | FINDLAY Zachary | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
34 | NAZARIO Dominic | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
35 | MCISAAC Finn | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | LATTA Zaiden | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
37 | MAVANI Krishna | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
38 | ZMUDA Aiden | 18% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
39 | LATTA Zamir | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - | - |
40 | LIN Vincent | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
41 | MARK IAN | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | TACK Everett | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
42 | MANGIONE Alexander | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.