Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% |
2 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 50% | |
3 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
3 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | |
5 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
6 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
7 | HAN Derek | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% | |
8 | LOGSDON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
9 | RAJPAL Alastair | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 15% | - |
10 | LAI Twayne | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
11 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
12 | SZIRAKI Jordan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 7% | - | |
13 | KELLY Tommy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
14 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 4% | |
15 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
16 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% | |
17 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 7% | |
18 | MASSIE Otto | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
19 | KNIBBE Nathan | 100% | 95% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | |
20 | STRINGER David | 100% | 82% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
21 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | - | |
22 | MAYNARD Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | - |
23 | TAMIYA Masao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
24 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - | |
25 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 2% | |
27 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
28 | TOWNE Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
29 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
30 | BHATTIPROLU Shrihit | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
31 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | TATE Liam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 12% | - | |
33 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
34 | NAZARIO Dominic | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
35 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | LATTA Zaiden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
37 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
38 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
39 | LATTA Zamir | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - | - |
40 | LIN Vincent | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | |
41 | MARK IAN | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | TACK Everett | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
42 | MANGIONE Alexander | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.