Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% |
2 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 20% |
3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% |
3 | REEVES Liam | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
5 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
6 | LU Yikai | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
6 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
8 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | - |
9 | VAN BUREN Brett J. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
10 | LOVIN Vlad | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
11 | CHENG Nathan | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
12 | GOGOI Vir K. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
13 | LEE Jacob | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
14 | JI Aidan Y. | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
15 | TANG Owen S. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
16 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 7% | 38% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
17 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
18 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
19 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
20 | DEDENBACH Joseph | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | POLONSKI Anthony | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
22 | LEE Lukas | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
23 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | KHAN Adnan | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
25 | LAI Twayne | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
26 | FU Steven | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
26 | ZHAO Bowen | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
26 | VALENTINO Paul | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.