Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MURRAY Maximo | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 33% | |
| 2 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% | |
| 3 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 3 | TANG Owen S. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 44% | 16% | ||
| 5 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 6% |
| 6 | LOVE Aaron | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 7 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | |
| 8 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% | ||
| 9 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 10 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 4% | 33% | 63% | |
| 11 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | 4% | 30% | 52% | 14% | |
| 12 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 6% |
| 13 | WANG Brayden | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | TSAO Lukas | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 15 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 29% | 3% | |
| 16 | KIM Adrian | 5% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | ROSE Ben | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | MIN Eric | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 36% | |
| 19 | LIU Michael H. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
| 20 | FINLEY Dylan | 6% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 21 | REYES Omar | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
| 22 | YAO Bradley | 1% | 12% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | KUO Evan | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 24 | LIN Michael | - | - | 8% | 31% | 43% | 18% | |
| 25 | PIERCE Cody | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | 8% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 28 | PARK Gabriel | 5% | 35% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | MANICKAM Varun | 11% | 46% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
| 29 | ANDRIC Borna | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | CHEN Kelton | 12% | 58% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | CAPRA Ethan | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ROBINSON Elliot G. | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | CHEN Kyle P. | 6% | 32% | 43% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 35 | TALASILA Arush | 37% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | PARK Ryan | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | LEE Dylan | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | LAM Nicolas | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | ||
| 40 | BARRETT Austin | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SINGH Kushaal | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | CHANDRA Josh T. | 73% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.