Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MURRAY Maximo | V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 2 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | TANG Owen S. | V D V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 5 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | LOVE Aaron | D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | DORAN Wesley C. | V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 9 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | SONG Aiden S. | V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | WONG Garrick G. | V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | KRYLTSOV Michael | V V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | WANG Brayden | D V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 14 | TSAO Lukas | D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 15 | WECHSLER Jacob | V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 16 | KIM Adrian | D D D D D | V V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 17 | ROSE Ben | V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 18 | MIN Eric | V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 19 | LIU Michael H. | V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | FINLEY Dylan | D V V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 21 | REYES Omar | V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | YAO Bradley | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | KUO Evan | D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 24 | LIN Michael | V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 25 | PIERCE Cody | V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 27 | DESHMUKH Arjun | V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 28 | PARK Gabriel | D V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | MANICKAM Varun | D D V D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 29 | ANDRIC Borna | V D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | CHEN Kelton | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 32 | CAPRA Ethan | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 33 | ROBINSON Elliot G. | D D D V V | D | 0.3 | 2 | +1.7 |
| 34 | CHEN Kyle P. | V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | TALASILA Arush | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 36 | PARK Ryan | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 37 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 38 | LEE Dylan | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 39 | LAM Nicolas | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | BARRETT Austin | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 41 | SINGH Kushaal | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 42 | CHANDRA Josh T. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.