July Challenge & Parafencing Nat'l Championships

Cadet Women's Foil

Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 8:30 AM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LEE Brianna J. - 2% 11% 33% 40% 15%
2 ZHANG Yunjia - - 2% 10% 30% 39% 18%
3 JING Emily - - - 3% 16% 41% 40%
3 CHEN Jia P. - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
5 SHEN Sophia H. - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
6 PETROVA Kristina - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
7 FANG Sabrina - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
8 STUTCHBURY Carolina J. - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
9 ZHENG Ivy - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
10 CHEN Allison V. - - 3% 23% 42% 27% 5%
11 CAO Arianna L. - - 1% 10% 32% 40% 17%
12 CHEN Jessie S. - 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
13 LI Phoebe J. - - 8% 32% 43% 16%
14 LUNG Katerina - - 3% 21% 45% 31%
15 CHUSID Mikayla - - 1% 7% 26% 41% 25%
16 KIM Katherine - 3% 18% 40% 32% 7%
17 KONG Chin-Yi - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
18 OH Erin H. - 5% 21% 38% 29% 6%
19 CHO Cameron S. - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2%
20 LIU Jaelyn A. - 2% 10% 28% 36% 20% 3%
21 LESLIE Ryanne T. - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
22 CASTANEDA Erika L. - 2% 13% 34% 37% 13%
23 YHIP Mikaela M. 1% 8% 30% 39% 19% 3%
24 SUN Ruoxi - 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
25 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" - - 5% 30% 42% 20% 3%
26 GRIFFIN Emma G. - 1% 6% 24% 44% 26%
27 KIM Rachael - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
27 LIU Angel(Daying) 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
29 LI Rachel Y. - 4% 31% 42% 20% 3%
30 KOROL Neta 1% 7% 27% 40% 22% 3%
31 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - - 3% 20% 42% 30% 6%
32 PEVZNER Victoria - 1% 8% 29% 42% 19%
33 WANG Ellen - 1% 7% 25% 43% 24%
34 TAN Kaitlyn N. - - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8%
35 KOSLOW Amicie 15% 40% 33% 11% 1% -
36 SHEN Lydia - - 3% 19% 39% 30% 8%
37 MI Anning 1% 27% 41% 23% 6% 1% -
38 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 18%
39 SULEIMAN Alena J. - 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1%
40 HO Brianna W. - - - 4% 19% 43% 34%
41 KOENIG Charlotte R. - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 13%
42 HE Fenghuan - - 3% 17% 38% 34% 8%
43 CHO Gracie L. - 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 6%
44 WU Julianna Y. - 3% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
45 RANDOLPH Piper 1% 11% 31% 34% 18% 4% -
46 SENIC Adeline - 2% 23% 43% 27% 5%
47 HUANG NATALIE 2% 18% 39% 31% 9% 1%
48 EYER Hailey M. - 5% 23% 40% 26% 5%
49 KONG Olivia 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 2%
50 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
51 GUERRA Sofia E. - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
52 ZHANG Alina C. - 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 7%
53 CHO Rebecca H. - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
54 LIU Joy Zhaoyi - 6% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1%
55 PENG Amber L. - 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% -
56 WONG Sophia M. - 5% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
57 NISSINOFF Alexandra 1% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
58 ZHAO Sophie L. 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
58 SUN Chien-Yu 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% -
60 KOROL Dana 11% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
61 FU Qihan 20% 42% 29% 8% 1% -
62 SHIH Diane - 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
63 DING Abigail 10% 33% 37% 16% 3% -
63 PAHLAVI Dahlia 2% 17% 38% 32% 11% 1%
65 HWANG Alison 2% 21% 40% 28% 8% 1% -
66 DUAN Konnie - 7% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
67 PANT Anisha 2% 17% 36% 31% 13% 2% -
68 LEE Lavender 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% -
69 WANDJI Anais 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
70 CHARALEL Jessica 48% 40% 11% 1% - -
71 LOCKE Savannah - 4% 17% 34% 31% 12% 2%
71 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia - 8% 36% 38% 15% 3% -
73 SEO IRENE Y. - 4% 23% 39% 26% 7% -
74 DE LA CRUZ Eden - 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1%
75 CABALU Alaina 61% 33% 6% - - - -
76 LEE Ji Ahn 30% 56% 13% 1% - -
77 CUI Amy 11% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
78 DONDERIS Hannah E. 38% 43% 16% 3% - -
79 GOOR Viviene E. 15% 39% 33% 11% 2% -
80 CHANG Elizabeth 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
81 DAVIS Bonnie Z. - 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
82 MI Aileen 3% 28% 41% 22% 5% - -
83 THIRUVENGADAM Harini 12% 51% 32% 5% - - -
84 HOBSON Ava 14% 50% 28% 6% 1% - -
85 LENZ Zoe N. 37% 49% 13% 1% - - -
86 PARK Leah 62% 33% 5% - - - -
87 QUINN Anna 67% 30% 3% - - - -
88 HSIUNG Samantha 3% 28% 50% 17% 2% - -
89 YU Jaime L. 10% 38% 36% 13% 2% -
90 CHEN Chloe I. 10% 43% 34% 11% 2% - -
91 NIKOLIC Alexandra 22% 41% 28% 8% 1% -
91 CHANDLER Darcy 55% 40% 4% - - -
93 XIANG Emma 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% -
94 PATTERSON Natalia 70% 26% 4% - - - -
95 ALANDIA Qiya 89% 10% - - - - -
96 HWANG Sophia 25% 46% 25% 4% - - -
97 FRANCIS Annette 68% 27% 4% - - - -
98 ZAMELIS Madelyn 83% 16% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.