Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GU Sarah | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 2 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 3 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 3 | LIN Waiyuk | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 6 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 7 | LEE Sumin | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 8 | REID Anousheh | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 9 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 10 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | MAO Amy | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 12 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 13 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 14 | LEE Michelle J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 15 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 16 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 17 | HU Grace | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% |
| 18 | LIU Christina A. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 19 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 20 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 21 | YAO Melinda | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 22 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | |
| 23 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 24 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 25 | LUO Ashley | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | NGUYEN Kira | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 27 | YU Nicole J. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 29 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 8% |
| 30 | NING Emma | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 31 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 32 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 3% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 35 | FENG ge | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 37 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 39 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 40 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 41 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% | |
| 42 | KORFONTA Jolie | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 43 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 1% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 43 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 45 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 45 | YIN Julia | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 48 | YAO Yilin | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ELSTON Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 50 | MING Cynthia | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 51 | HONG Elaine | 3% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 54 | LI Charlotte | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | PEELER Julia | 8% | 41% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 57 | NAKA Emily | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | LEE Yedda | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 59 | SHEN Stephanie | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 60 | CHOI Grace | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | PRIHODKO Nina | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 62 | KALE Anika A. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 62 | LEE Olivia | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 65 | BURCHETT Victoria | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LONADIER Keira | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
| 67 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 10% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 67 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 69 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | SUN Renee R. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 71 | PANT Anisha | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 71 | YAO KATHARINE | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 73 | MIN MAGNOLIA | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | HABERMAN Hailey | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | POON Desiree | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 77 | ZENG Katrina | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 78 | CHA Eugenie | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 79 | SHU Youshan | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 81 | CARRIER Meredith | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | RUSSELL Alison | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 84 | FRANCIS Annette | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | CHANG Ella | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 86 | MUN Brianna K. | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | MIINEA Elena | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | LIANG Yuanfeng | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | KIM Jayna | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 90 | LIN Ashley | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 91 | LE Jennifer | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 92 | SOOHOO Claire | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 93 | CHANDLER Darcy | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | LEE Camilla | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.