Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
2 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
3 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
3 | LIN Waiyuk | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
5 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
6 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% |
7 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
8 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
9 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
10 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
11 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
12 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | |
13 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
14 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
15 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
16 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
17 | HU Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
18 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
19 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
20 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
21 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
23 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
24 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
25 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
26 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
27 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
28 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
29 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 8% |
30 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
31 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
32 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
34 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
35 | FENG ge | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
36 | CHAN Cheri K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
37 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
38 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
39 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
40 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
41 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
42 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
43 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
43 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
45 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
45 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
47 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
48 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
49 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
50 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | - |
51 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 97% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
52 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
53 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
54 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
55 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 92% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
56 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
57 | NAKA Emily | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
58 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
59 | SHEN Stephanie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
60 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
61 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
62 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
62 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
64 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
65 | BURCHETT Victoria | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
66 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% |
67 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 100% | 90% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
67 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
69 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
70 | SUN Renee R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
71 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
71 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
73 | MIN MAGNOLIA | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
74 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
75 | POON Desiree | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
76 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
77 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
78 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
79 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
80 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
81 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 81% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
82 | RUSSELL Alison | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
83 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
84 | FRANCIS Annette | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
85 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
86 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
87 | MIINEA Elena | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
88 | LIANG Yuanfeng | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
89 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
90 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | LE Jennifer | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
92 | SOOHOO Claire | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
93 | CHANDLER Darcy | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
94 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.