July Challenge & Parafencing Nat'l Championships

Junior Women's Épée

Sunday, July 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HUSISIAN Hadley N. - - - 1% 7% 34% 59%
2 GU Sarah - 1% 7% 26% 42% 23%
3 KETKAR Ketki - - - 1% 9% 36% 55%
3 PARK Faith K. - - - 1% 7% 36% 56%
5 MACHULSKY Leehi - - - 2% 15% 43% 40%
6 ZAFFT Tatiana M. - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
7 PATURU Meghana - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
8 TYLER Syd - 3% 13% 32% 36% 16%
9 KHAMIS Yasmine A. - - - 1% 9% 36% 54%
10 OXENREIDER Tierna A. - - - 3% 15% 41% 42%
11 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
12 ZIGALO Elizabeth - 4% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
13 KUZNETSOV Victoria - - 5% 18% 35% 31% 10%
14 PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
15 CHEN Lefu - 1% 9% 30% 40% 19% 2%
16 LEUNG Natalie 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
17 MILLETTE Marie Frederique - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
18 CHIN Isabella - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
19 LIN Jessica Y. - - - - 3% 23% 74%
19 GANDHI Sedna S. - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
21 CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 12%
22 LIU Christina A. - 1% 9% 29% 39% 20% 2%
23 WANG Karen - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 28%
24 WANG Elizabeth - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
25 WATRALL Christina - - 4% 21% 43% 31%
26 LEANG Priscilla Y. 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
27 NING Emma - 1% 8% 24% 36% 24% 6%
28 HU Grace - 1% 8% 28% 41% 22%
29 GAJJALA Sharika R. 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
30 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
31 RUNIONS Emersyn - 4% 16% 33% 32% 13% 1%
32 NGUYEN Kaylin A. - 2% 10% 29% 36% 20% 3%
33 LIN Katie Y. - 1% 5% 23% 44% 27%
34 CHU Audrey 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 5%
35 LEE Sumin - - 1% 9% 30% 43% 16%
36 XU Grace (XinYi) - 1% 6% 24% 41% 26% 3%
37 YU Nicole J. 1% 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
38 YANG Miranda (Yinuo) - 2% 10% 30% 39% 18%
39 O'DONNELL Amanda A. - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
40 LUO Ashley 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4%
41 BOYS Nishta B. - 2% 13% 35% 37% 12%
42 COBERT Helen G. - 5% 20% 36% 28% 9% 1%
43 FILIPPOV Nika D. 1% 9% 31% 39% 18% 3% -
43 WANG Nora - 5% 20% 34% 29% 11% 1%
45 GABERKORN Nadia - 2% 12% 29% 35% 18% 3%
46 CHOI Eunice - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
47 SEBASTIAN Felicity A. - 1% 9% 29% 37% 21% 4%
48 MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
49 PADHYE Tanishka 1% 11% 31% 37% 17% 3%
50 YAO Yilin 25% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
51 KIM Elizabeth Y. 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 3%
52 NGUYEN Tallulah 5% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1%
53 TEMIRYAEV Anna M. - 5% 24% 39% 25% 6% -
54 JOYCE Michaela - - - < 1% 5% 29% 66%
55 SUN Renee R. 7% 27% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
56 MCLANE Lauren - - 2% 13% 37% 39% 9%
57 GAO Judy 1% 9% 31% 38% 18% 3% -
58 GUMAGAY Erika L. 2% 15% 37% 33% 12% 1%
59 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. - 2% 11% 33% 41% 14%
60 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. - 1% 7% 28% 43% 21%
61 WU Amelia - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
62 YAO KATHARINE 5% 28% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
63 BEZUGLAYA Varvara 23% 42% 26% 8% 1% - -
64 ZHANG mickey 14% 36% 34% 14% 3% -
65 PAPADAKIS Lily 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% -
66 ZHU Chenxi (Heidi) - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
67 BEI Karen - - 2% 12% 34% 41% 11%
68 ZHANG Tina Tianyi - 1% 6% 23% 38% 27% 5%
69 NI Emma - 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5%
70 DESAI Meera P. 3% 18% 34% 31% 12% 2%
71 AHUJA Arianna 9% 30% 37% 20% 5% -
72 LEE Michelle J. - 3% 16% 34% 34% 12%
72 XUAN Nicole J. 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
74 CHAN Cheri K. - 4% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
75 KALE Anika A. 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
76 NGUYEN Kira - 3% 12% 30% 35% 18% 2%
77 MALDONADO Pilar I. - 3% 15% 35% 35% 12%
78 DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia - 1% 13% 34% 34% 15% 2%
79 MAO Amy - 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
80 MING Cynthia 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
81 WEBER Nora 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
82 JOYAL Anne-Sophie 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
83 MIN MAGNOLIA 2% 21% 38% 27% 9% 1% -
84 LONG Cindy 1% 13% 33% 33% 16% 3% -
85 CHERNIS Zoe C. 1% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
86 MUN Brianna K. 26% 46% 22% 4% - - -
87 FENG ge 6% 26% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
88 KIM Zoe L. 1% 11% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
89 KIM Jayna 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
90 LONADIER Keira 10% 31% 36% 19% 4% -
91 HILL Phoebe 16% 40% 31% 11% 2% -
92 ALEXANDROV Katherine S. 2% 14% 34% 35% 13% 2%
93 KETKAR Mallika - 2% 12% 33% 38% 15%
94 DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1%
94 ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
94 KORFONTA Jolie 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4%
97 SCHAFF Marlene M. 7% 29% 39% 21% 4% -
98 ELSTON Sophia 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% -
99 REID Anousheh - 4% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
100 WEISS Talia L. - 3% 13% 32% 35% 15% 2%
101 LEANG Andrea K. - 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
102 SMOTRITSKY Mia 2% 12% 29% 34% 18% 4% -
103 LEE kyungmin - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
104 HONG Elaine 10% 31% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
105 NELSON-LOVE Lily B. - 4% 18% 34% 31% 12% 2%
106 PEELER Julia 10% 30% 35% 20% 5% 1% -
107 PANT Anisha 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% - -
108 RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. - - 1% 8% 27% 43% 21%
109 NAKA Karen 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
110 FELAND Alexandra 3% 16% 34% 31% 13% 3% -
111 KIM Rachael - 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% -
112 SANTA MARIA Luisa F. 1% 14% 35% 33% 14% 2% -
113 LIN Waiyuk 1% 6% 22% 36% 26% 8% 1%
114 OPERARIO Abigail Z. 12% 34% 34% 16% 3% -
115 MINOR Lindsey 9% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
116 PRIHODKO Nina 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% -
117 CALDERA Lexi I. 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% -
118 WHITESIDES Ella K. 45% 41% 13% 2% - -
119 CHANG Ella 33% 46% 18% 3% - - -
120 LEE Yedda 4% 21% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
120 ZHANG Victoria R. 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4% -
122 MEHROTRA Anya - 3% 16% 35% 33% 11% 1%
123 TSANG JAFFE Avi 4% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
123 KIM Erika S. 6% 34% 38% 17% 4% - -
123 DU Shunyi（Wendy） 18% 40% 30% 10% 2% - -
126 GAURIAT Jade S. 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
126 CHA Eugenie 58% 34% 7% 1% - - -
128 SHERTZ Kira E. 13% 46% 31% 8% 1% - -
128 RAINEY Zoe-Andrea 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
130 SHEN Stephanie 1% 10% 32% 37% 17% 3% -
131 NASON Amelia 44% 46% 10% 1% - - -
132 WANG anne - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
133 ZENG Katrina 25% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
133 LIANG Yuanfeng 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
135 PARKS Eliana 57% 34% 8% 1% - - -
136 SIVAGAR Fiona 7% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
137 SHU Youshan 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
138 GOLDBERG Sophie C. 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
139 LIN Ashley 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -
140 CHAN Elizabeth 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
141 HABERMAN Hailey 32% 51% 15% 2% - - -
142 POON Desiree 69% 27% 4% - - - -
143 RUSSELL Alison 32% 44% 20% 4% - -
143 LE Jennifer 12% 41% 35% 11% 2% -
145 BARNES Olivia R. 14% 36% 34% 14% 3% -
146 LI Charlotte 38% 42% 17% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.