Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
2 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 20% |
3 | CHU Audrey | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
3 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
5 | FELAND Alexandra | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
6 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
7 | MAO Amy | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
8 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
9 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
10 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
11 | WITTE Vera | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
12 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
13 | SMITH Grace L. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
14 | YU Nicole J. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
15 | LEE Olivia | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
16 | EDWARDS Auprell | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
17 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
18 | REID Sobia | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
19 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
20 | HAFEEZ Hania | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
21 | WONG Alexandra R. | 3% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
22 | LAN Alice S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
23 | WITTER Catherine A. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
25 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
26 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
26 | BUSH Emma | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
28 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
29 | PAN Michelle | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
30 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
31 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
32 | ANDERSON Claire | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
34 | DONDISCH Sophia | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
35 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
36 | YOU Emily | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | |
37 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
38 | CHA Eugenie | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
39 | KALE Anika A. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 2% |
40 | HEPLER Sarah | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
41 | NGUYEN Audrey | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
42 | KUKVA Taisiya | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
43 | SMUK Daria A. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
44 | LEE Natasha | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
45 | SONG Angela | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
46 | HICKS Grace | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
47 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
48 | FENG ge | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
49 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
50 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | FURMAN Maria | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
52 | COBERT Helen G. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
53 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
54 | LONADIER Keira | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
55 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
56 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
57 | BOTNER Olivia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
58 | PRIHODKO Nina | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
59 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% | |
60 | BARBARA Camille | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
61 | GUJJA Misha | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
62 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
62 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
64 | LIN Ashley | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
65 | SHARMA Sanvi | 3% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
66 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
66 | DU Shunyi(Wendy) | 10% | 29% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | CHOI Grace | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
69 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
70 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
71 | LIN Elaine | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
72 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
73 | WALLER Sarah I. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
74 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
75 | GAO Judy | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
76 | KIZILBASH Zara | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | |
77 | LIU Nicole | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
78 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
79 | LU Junyao | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
80 | PROKOPEAS Grace | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
81 | LI Alisha | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
82 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
83 | YAO Yilin | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
84 | ZHU Serene M. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% | - |
85 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
86 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
87 | SPRINGER Sierra | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
88 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
89 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
90 | RATH Lauren N. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
91 | LI Charlotte | 19% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
92 | SINHA Zara | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
93 | TAN Jocelyn | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
94 | KELLY Jenna | 6% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
95 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
96 | HABERMAN Hailey | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
97 | LAVERY Chloe K. | < 1% | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
98 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
99 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
99 | SHU Youshan | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.