Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 2 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 20% |
| 3 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% |
| 3 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 5 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 6 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 7 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 8 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 9 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
| 10 | SEMIKIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 11 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 24% | 5% |
| 13 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 14 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 6% |
| 15 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 18 | REID Sobia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 19 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 20 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 9% | |
| 23 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 25 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 26 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 29 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 30 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 31 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 56% | 24% | 5% |
| 32 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 34 | DONDISCH Sophia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | YOU Emily | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 38 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 2% |
| 40 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 41 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 45 | SONG Angela | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 48 | FENG ge | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 50 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 95% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 53 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 55 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 56 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | |
| 57 | BOTNER Olivia | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 58 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 59 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 60 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 61 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 62 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 62 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 64 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 73% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 66 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | DU Shunyi（Wendy） | 100% | 90% | 61% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 68 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 69 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 7% |
| 70 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 71 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 72 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 73 | WALLER Sarah I. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 74 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 75 | GAO Judy | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 76 | KIZILBASH Zara | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 77 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 78 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 79 | LU Junyao | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 80 | PROKOPEAS Grace | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | LI Alisha | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 82 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 83 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 84 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 85 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 86 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
| 87 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
| 88 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 89 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 90 | RATH Lauren N. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 91 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 92 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 93 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 94 | KELLY Jenna | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 95 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 96 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 88% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 97 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 98 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 99 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 100% | 79% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.