Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DUNCAN Corwin | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 2 | ELSAYED Ahmed | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 3 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 3 | DOLGONOS Mark | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 5 | HILLYER Rourke W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 6 | SPITERI Gareth J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 7 | ZHENG Hagen | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 43% |
| 9 | CHA Russell W. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 10 | MCKINLEY Liam K. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | DELANEY Alexander D. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 11% |
| 12 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 13 | YOON Sungho | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 14 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 15 | KANG Michael H. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 16 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 17 | SMITH Justin C. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | BAKER Kevin G. | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 20 | GANA Jorge A. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 21 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 22 | SANDERS Ian W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 23 | KIM Derek D. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 24 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | |
| 25 | LEE Timothy S. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 26 | RODELL Hunter C. | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | PANTEL Adam S. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 28 | GANA Thomas A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 29 | YOON Nathan | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | MAURER Chip P. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 31 | GIBSON Tristan C. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 32 | DOAN Joseph M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 33 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 34 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | HSING Lucas W. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 36 | ZHANG Matthew | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | BHATNAGAR Nishay V. | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | WOLOSINSKI Peter | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | BANYON-MRAK Aiden J. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 42 | KOKENGE Clark | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 43 | CHEN Eric Y. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | PARK Minchan | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CONNELL Jay | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 46 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 47 | BOWERMAN Lucas A. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 48 | KUMAR Anitya | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% | |
| 50 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 51 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 52 | KIM Juni C. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 53 | CARVALHO Daniel S. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 54 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 55 | BARREIRO Darren | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 56 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | COHEN Jared E. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 58 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | KRENZ Michal A. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 60 | YI Kyle | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 62 | GREGORY Abram | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | MUFEL Andrew | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 64 | KIM Minjun | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | MRAK Michael R. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 67 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 68 | CHOUDHARY Grisham | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 69 | HEKMAT Sina R. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 70 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 71 | MA Anthony | 22% | 46% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 72 | NIXON Christian A. | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | WANG Albert | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | BAGLEY Ryan P. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 75 | SAWASDIKOSOL Sansana | 38% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 76 | MCDARBY Kieron M. | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 77 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 78 | LI Jeffrey | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.