Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
2 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
3 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
3 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
5 | RUSSO Francesca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
6 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
7 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
8 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 29% |
9 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 41% |
10 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
11 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
12 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 13% |
13 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
14 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
15 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
16 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
17 | JOHNSON Honor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | |
18 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
19 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
20 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
21 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
22 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
23 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
23 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
25 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
26 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
27 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 14% | |
28 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 22% | 2% |
29 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
30 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
31 | LU Elaine | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
32 | PEDRAZA Regina | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | - | |
33 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
34 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
35 | KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 37% |
36 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
37 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
38 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
39 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
40 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
41 | SAYLES Nina R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
42 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
43 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
44 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
45 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
46 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
47 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
48 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
49 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
50 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
51 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
52 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
53 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% |
54 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
55 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 25% | 5% |
56 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
57 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
58 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
59 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
60 | KER Grace | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
61 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
62 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | GHAYALOD Reya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
64 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
65 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
66 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
67 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
68 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
69 | SADIK HANA | 100% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - |
70 | JOHNSON Lauren | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
71 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
72 | YODER Bridget H. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
73 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 39% | 10% |
74 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
75 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
76 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
77 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
78 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
79 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
80 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
81 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
82 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
83 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
84 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
85 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
86 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% | |
87 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
88 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
89 | PALEO Gabriella | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
90 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
91 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
92 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
93 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
93 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
95 | SUN Alyssa | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
96 | XI Shining | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
97 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 4% | - | |
98 | XIAO julie | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
99 | TIBURCIO Diana | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
100 | BROWN Emma | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
101 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
102 | LU Amy | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
103 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
104 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
105 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
105 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
105 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
108 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
108 | NI Sharon | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
110 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
110 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
112 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
113 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
114 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
114 | YANG Lea | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
116 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
116 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
118 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
119 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
120 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
121 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
122 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
122 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
124 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.