Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CARTER Jane P. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
2 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |
3 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
3 | PANYI Maria | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
5 | BASSIK Judith M. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
6 | LYTLE Darby A. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
7 | KERR Margaret E. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 1% |
8 | DREYER Nadia S. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
9 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 6% |
10 | FAGAN Margaret | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
11 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
12 | RATCHFORD Mary Jo | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
13 | MORRISON Monica L. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
14 | LEE Claire L. | 11% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | |
15 | POLLETTA Julie | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
16 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 6% | 43% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
17 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 5% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | |
18 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 7% | 36% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
19 | SHANKS Jennifer | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
20 | MARTIN Carolyn | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.