Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CARTER Jane P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 2 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 3 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 10% | |
| 3 | PANYI Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 5 | BASSIK Judith M. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 6 | LYTLE Darby A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 7 | KERR Margaret E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 8 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
| 9 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 6% |
| 10 | FAGAN Margaret | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | |
| 11 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
| 12 | RATCHFORD Mary Jo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 13 | MORRISON Monica L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 14 | LEE Claire L. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | POLLETTA Julie | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 16 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 100% | 94% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 18 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 93% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | SHANKS Jennifer | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 20 | MARTIN Carolyn | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.