Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 2 | GOOSSENS Bruno | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 3 | MOREAU John A. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 28% |
| 3 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 5 | SPAHN Jeff | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 5% |
| 6 | NEWSOME James L. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | FLINT James E. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | BLAKLEY Dwain | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 10% |
| 9 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 34% |
| 10 | HENRY Mark R. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 11 | SCHWARY Irv | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 12 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 13 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 14 | HOLLINGSWORTH Frank J. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | REA John P. | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 18 | DEOLIVARES JOSE M. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 21 | REDDING Russel M. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.