Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 2 | GOOSSENS Bruno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 3 | MOREAU John A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 28% |
| 3 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 5 | SPAHN Jeff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 5% |
| 6 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 7 | FLINT James E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
| 8 | BLAKLEY Dwain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 10% |
| 9 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 10 | HENRY Mark R. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 11 | SCHWARY Irv | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 12 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 13 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 14 | HOLLINGSWORTH Frank J. | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | REA John P. | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 18 | DEOLIVARES JOSE M. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 21 | REDDING Russel M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.