Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 27% | 2% |
| 2 | PIATKOWSKI-NAZARRO RPT Marek W. | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 3 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 3 | SESSIONS Adrian | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 5 | STREB Joseph S. | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 6 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | NEWSOME James L. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
| 8 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 9 | HILL David E. | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 10 | REA John P. | 25% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 11 | CARVEY Davis W. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | - |
| 12 | SCHWARY Irv | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.