Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 2% |
2 | PIATKOWSKI-NAZARRO RPT Marek W. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
3 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
3 | SESSIONS Adrian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
5 | STREB Joseph S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
6 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
7 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
8 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
9 | HILL David E. | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
10 | REA John P. | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
11 | CARVEY Davis W. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | - |
12 | SCHWARY Irv | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.