Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SUAREZ Rafael A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 76% |
| 2 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% |
| 3 | OLIVARES Frets G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 35% |
| 3 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 56% |
| 5 | CHILTON Ken | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% |
| 6 | FELDMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% |
| 7 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 32% |
| 8 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 12% |
| 10 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% |
| 11 | NORMILE Jon M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 14% |
| 12 | POPOKH Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% |
| 13 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 20% |
| 14 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 93% | 63% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 15 | WAY Kashi M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | VALENTINE Iain | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | 2% |
| 17 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 23% | 3% |
| 18 | ISSA Naoum P. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 19 | FADL Omar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 18% | 1% |
| 20 | NIEMIEC Mark | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 100% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | SUAREZ Rolando | 100% | 97% | 73% | 26% | 3% | - |
| 23 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 100% | 83% | 36% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | SCHOENACK Jason A. | 100% | 99% | 37% | 5% | - | - |
| 25 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 77% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | KISSINGFORD John F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 63% | 18% | 1% |
| 27 | GRISWOLD Doug | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 3% | - |
| 28 | BERGER Jamie | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | NEWELL Tim | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 30 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 31 | TOWSTER Robert | 100% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | DALRYMPLE Sr. Ronald W. | 100% | 88% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 100% | 87% | 38% | 6% | - | - |
| 34 | CLAUSEN Matthew J. | 100% | 88% | 45% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | NEAS Derek | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | WEMPLE Charles | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.