USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div II Women's Foil

Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 1:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ORVANANOS Anice V V D V V V V V V V V V 5.2 5 -0.2
2 TAKAMIZAWA Yukari V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
3 MI Aileen V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
3 DUAN Konnie V V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
5 FUNG Vera V V V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
6 HAN Crystal V D V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
7 MICHAELSEN Emily V V D V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
8 CHOW Annabelle V D V V V V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
9 LUO Sandra J. V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
10 HOBSON Ava V V V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
11 XIANG Emma V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
12 TOLBERT Zoe V D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
13 LEE Allison V V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
14 LIPKOVITZ Rivka V V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
15 SHENG Chuxi V V V D V D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
16 LEE Ariana V V D V V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
17 LIU Siyuan V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 CHEN Chloe I. V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
19 RENTON Samantha V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
20 STRUGAR Steliana V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
21 ZHUANG Christina V V V V V V V D 3.1 6 +2.9
22 LAMBERT Mahala V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
23 DAVIS Bonnie Z. V V V D V V V D 5.0 5 -
24 SHIH Diane V V V V D V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
25 YIN Helen V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
26 KO Claire D V V V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
27 JIANG Yangying (Amanda) V V D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
28 ZHOU Catherine V V D D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
29 WU Irene M. V D V D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
30 ZHENG Julie D D V V V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
31 PATTERSON Natalia D V D V D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
32 CASTANEDA Keira D D D D V V V D 1.9 1 -0.9
33 BOLES Amanda X. V V V V V D 1.9 5 +3.1
34 DU Hannah V V V V V D D 4.4 5 +0.6
35 DO Leila V V V V D V D 2.7 5 +2.3
36 FUNG Emma V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
37 WANG Jasmine D V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
38 WEBB Ella V V D V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
39 BOLES Sophia D V V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
40 FELLMAN Sara V V V D V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
41 WONG Sophia M. V D D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
42 YANICELLI Sloane D V V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
43 LI Sophia M. D V V D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
44 LENZ Zoe N. D D V V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
44 SUN Emily D V V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
46 HUANG NATALIE V V D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
46 ZHANG Eunice V D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
48 KETTELLE Molly V D V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
49 HAN Ashley V D V V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
50 WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. V V D D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
51 OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. V V D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
52 SHA Yi Ling D V V V D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
53 HSIEH Rebecca D V V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
54 RAO Sonia D. V D D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
55 LIU Sophia D D V V V D V D 4.3 3 -1.3
56 WEI Angela D V V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
57 PAULUS Isabella V D V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
58 POWERS Meredith R. V D D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
59 BEAVER Hannah V V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
60 BHAN Zala V V D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
61 HAN Katherine V D D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
62 YE Eileen V D D D V D V D 4.8 2 -2.8
63 LIN Ju-An Adrianne D D V D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
64 CABALU Alaina D D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
65 GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) D V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
66 UNGERER Frieda D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
67 COKER Bettina M. V D V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
68 SUH Kailey E. V V V D D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
69 LI Eleanor V V D V D V D 1.5 4 +2.5
70 VOHRA Anusha D V V V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
71 MI Anning D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
72 CANNON Lira J. D D V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
73 SIMONOV Dasha V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
74 CHEN Jasmine V V D V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
75 HSIEH Sabrina V V V D D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
76 D'ORAZIO Sofia V. D V V V D D D 3.3 3 -0.3
77 ASCHETTINO Aurora V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
78 MEYER Claudia D V D V V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
79 SCHMIDT Victoria D D V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
79 ZHANG Selena V D D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
81 LEVY Avery V V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
82 PARK Leah D V D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
83 LONG Madeline M. D V D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
84 QUINN Anna D D V V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
85 DEMOSS Mercedes V D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
86 NUNLEY Victoria V D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
87 BAWA Sahana D D V D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
88 BASSIK Eva D D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
89 NIKOLIC Alexandra D D V V D D D 4.1 2 -2.1
90 KUNDU TRISHA V D D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
91 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol D D D D V V D 1.3 2 +0.7
92 MCLAURIN Semini D V D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
93 ZHAO Aimee D D D D V V D 0.8 2 +1.2
94 NEWMAN Ariel D D D V V D D 2.0 2 -
95 TOBIN Brean D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
96 HERNANDEZ Melany D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
97 ROLOFF Katarina M. D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
98 HUNT Abigail S. D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
99 FULIGNI Isabella D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
100 SETHRE Traci D D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
101 ROHRING Anna D V D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
102 NIRGUDE Siddhi D D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
102 CHENG Isa D V D D D D D 0.3 1 +0.7
104 STONE Colleen R. D D D D D V 1.2 1 -0.2
105 SCARLETT Skye V D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
105 TOMASI Samantha D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
107 BRUSH Sydney D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
108 SULTER Aurelie D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
109 KAPOOR Saanvi D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
110 ZAMELIS Madelyn D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
111 ZHENG Zoe D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
112 SHELARE Mehal D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
113 MADSEN Lindsey D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
114 GREENLEAF Ella D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
115 MURDOCH ROY Grace D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
115 DONDERIS Katherine D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
117 BURTON Sequoia D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
118 NORTH Zoe M. D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
118 CRANFILL Madison D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
120 OWINGS Anna D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
120 BROCE Lilianna D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
120 HOLCOMB Emily D D D D D D 0.0 0 -
123 KLINE Rachel D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.