Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 2 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 3 | MI Aileen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 3 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% | |
| 5 | FUNG Vera | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 6 | HAN Crystal | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% |
| 7 | MICHAELSEN Emily | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 8 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | ||
| 9 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 10 | HOBSON Ava | 2% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% | ||
| 11 | XIANG Emma | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 12 | TOLBERT Zoe | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 13 | LEE Allison | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 3% | |
| 15 | SHENG Chuxi | - | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 16 | LEE Ariana | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
| 17 | LIU Siyuan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
| 18 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 19 | RENTON Samantha | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 43% |
| 20 | STRUGAR Steliana | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 21 | ZHUANG Christina | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | LAMBERT Mahala | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 23 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 26% |
| 24 | SHIH Diane | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
| 25 | YIN Helen | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 26 | KO Claire | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | JIANG Yangying (Amanda) | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 28 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | WU Irene M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 30 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 31 | PATTERSON Natalia | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 32 | CASTANEDA Keira | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | BOLES Amanda X. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 34 | DU Hannah | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 35 | DO Leila | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | FUNG Emma | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 37 | WANG Jasmine | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | WEBB Ella | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 39 | BOLES Sophia | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 40 | FELLMAN Sara | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 41 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 20% |
| 42 | YANICELLI Sloane | 1% | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LI Sophia M. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 44 | LENZ Zoe N. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | SUN Emily | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 46 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 46 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 48 | KETTELLE Molly | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 49 | HAN Ashley | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 50 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% | |
| 51 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 52 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 53 | HSIEH Rebecca | - | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
| 54 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | LIU Sophia | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% |
| 56 | WEI Angela | - | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 57 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 58 | POWERS Meredith R. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 59 | BEAVER Hannah | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 60 | BHAN Zala | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 61 | HAN Katherine | - | 9% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | YE Eileen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 63 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 64 | CABALU Alaina | 5% | 31% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | UNGERER Frieda | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 67 | COKER Bettina M. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 68 | SUH Kailey E. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 69 | LI Eleanor | 11% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | VOHRA Anusha | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 71 | MI Anning | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 72 | CANNON Lira J. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
| 73 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 74 | CHEN Jasmine | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 75 | HSIEH Sabrina | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 76 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 77 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 13% | ||
| 78 | MEYER Claudia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 79 | SCHMIDT Victoria | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 79 | ZHANG Selena | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 81 | LEVY Avery | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 82 | PARK Leah | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 83 | LONG Madeline M. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 84 | QUINN Anna | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 85 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 86 | NUNLEY Victoria | 7% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 87 | BAWA Sahana | - | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 88 | BASSIK Eva | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 89 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 90 | KUNDU TRISHA | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | MCLAURIN Semini | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | ZHAO Aimee | 36% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 94 | NEWMAN Ariel | 1% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 95 | TOBIN Brean | 5% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 96 | HERNANDEZ Melany | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 97 | ROLOFF Katarina M. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 98 | HUNT Abigail S. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 99 | FULIGNI Isabella | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 100 | SETHRE Traci | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 101 | ROHRING Anna | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 102 | NIRGUDE Siddhi | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | CHENG Isa | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | STONE Colleen R. | 16% | 53% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 105 | SCARLETT Skye | - | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 105 | TOMASI Samantha | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | BRUSH Sydney | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 108 | SULTER Aurelie | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 109 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | ||
| 110 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 24% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 111 | ZHENG Zoe | 10% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 112 | SHELARE Mehal | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 113 | MADSEN Lindsey | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 114 | GREENLEAF Ella | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 115 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 31% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 115 | DONDERIS Katherine | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 117 | BURTON Sequoia | 11% | 52% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 118 | NORTH Zoe M. | 35% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 118 | CRANFILL Madison | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 120 | OWINGS Anna | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | BROCE Lilianna | 63% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | HOLCOMB Emily | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 123 | KLINE Rachel | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.